All,
Here is the latest superintendent snapshot on school safety. Please continue to submit your questions by clicking here. Have a great week!
All,
Here is the latest superintendent snapshot on school safety. Please continue to submit your questions by clicking here. Have a great week!
Dear Patrons of Granite School District,
The district recently hosted two informational meetings in the Cottonwood and Granger High communities to answer questions regarding the process by which a community could reconfigure the 9th grade into the high school.
It is important to understand that while there is evidence to suggest that such a model can be advantageous, a decision of this magnitude should be supported and advocated by a community as a whole. These informational meetings were held to begin that process and provide information to a community on how to pursue such a change if they desired. We would encourage you to review the presentation (attached below) that outlines the complete process.
While a number of the questions you will read were answered at the meeting, we have chosen to reprint these questions (see attachment below with complete Q&A). If there additional questions, you can submit those to communications@graniteschools.org and they will be added to this document as they are received.
As you can see from the Grade Reconfiguration Attachment (below), we are still very early in the discussion phase of this proposal. We anticipate that those advocating for this proposal will be providing additional information so that our patrons can make an informed choice on this matter.
We have categorized the questions (as some of them are quite similar) into topics and then broken down the individual questions with each letter. The answers directly follow each question in the same subsection and are bolded and colored. While we attempted to be succinct, some questions required additional information to clarify appropriate information.
Thanks for your questions.
Question – Why is it that all teachers working in a title one school, regardless of it they work with title one designated kids, get a big bonus and the title one aides, who help immensely to run the classrooms and wherever needed, get no part of it. It is very frustrating to do all that we do and not be acknowledged as the teachers are.
Response – We value the work of para educators and recognize that they make great contributions to student achievement. The Title I Stipend / Incentive is allowed by federal law to recruit and retain licensed educators in Title I schools. Unfortunately the law does not allow these types of incentives to non-licensed staff.
Thanks to our Title I Director for his assistance in responding to this question.
Question – When will the newest idea from our state legislators take effect? When are our schools going to be graded and what are the qualifiers?
Response – I share your frustration that oftentimes, the mandates passed on from the legislature can be taxing and decrease morale among our hardworking educators. Currently, the school grading bill is undergoing some amendments for implementation this next fall. We are working to communicate with our legislators the impacts of all programs and suggest you do the same. At this point it looks as though implementation of the new “system” will be delayed for another year.
By the way, regardless of the grade that ultimately results – we encourage you to celebrate the growth of each student with the student’s parents. With my very own children, when I know that they are progressing, achieving, love learning, and have teachers who genuinely care about them and their growth, I’m not particularly interested in the label the building gets on some report downtown. if we focus on the things we know make a difference pedagogically, kids will thrive, parents will be pleased and, I believe, the school grading system will take care of itself.
Thanks for serving the kids!
Question – The Cognos IBM tool available on the USOE site is great for transparency. It has illustrated that the charter schools are not succeeding at the rate the parents think they are. Unfortunately, as an STS who was trained on the program I can “filter out” the special populations of our schools. When I look at the neighborhood schools compared to the charter schools the neighborhood schools are succeeding at a far better rate than assumed with and without those filters. When schools do not make AYP sometimes it is due to special ed, attendance or high mobility populations. Is there a method in which we can make the message “that involved parents have successful students” more available? Every school I go to I see involved parents with extremely successful students.
When I talk to parents who have sent their children to charter schools they seem to emphasize that these charter schools emphasize arts and science more and have a smaller student to teacher ratio. My frustration is that all the resources are being pulled from the district schools to make these charter schools happen. How did the parents become so disenfranchised that instead of investing in our schools they prefer to create whole new buildings and systems? I applaud the tax hike last year to accommodate all the physical educators but maybe all these parents that moved their students would prefer to invest more in the schools but are not sure how to. How can we involve these parents so that they can help us to create the schools they want instead of going elsewhere?
Lastly, I think the size of our district enables us to do great things that other districts can not. We have great programs in place and great resources. It would be nice to see our students reflect on the great things in our district and their local schools. I know the PTA does a reflections assembly and the US forest service used to do a tree poster contest. Can we as a district do something like this to emphasis how great we are. We have certified dedicated teachers, great new schools being built, technology specialists, PE specialists……let’s have students clelebrate these things.
In closing I know these ideas are not foreign. PTA is suppose to be the conduit for change and dialogue and teacher of the year awards are to celebrate our district strengths but they are not. We need to change our image, our schools are succeeding in many ways, yet the news is full of depressing statistics. Thank you for your time.
Response – You bring up a number of great points that are currently being addressed by me and my staff. We have communicated with principals directly, the importance of ascertaining if students are leaving to go to charter schools. And we encourage them to take steps to shore up their programs to prevent or stop the loss! Our Communications Department continues to work to highlight programs and school successes for the media and our legislators to ensure that information is getting out to the parents who ultimately make these decisions. We continue to work to identify these successes in our schools and could use any tips for programs or individual successes that should be recognized and publicized. Anyone can submit ideas tocommunications@graniteschools.org.
Lastly, we continue to work on other plausible marketing techniques to raise the profile of Granite District. Look for some of these to be implemented over the next year. While we don’t want to give anything away, they will be noticeable and draw significant attention to the efforts our great educators are making in our classrooms everyday.
Please know however, at the end of the day the very best advocate for our schools are the people who work and volunteer in them – we have thousands of “marketing agents” who have personal access to their neighbors. Just think of the power if all of our employees and volunteers committed to share just one great thing they see happening with three people each day who don’t work or volunteer at their school!
Thanks for all you do – including eating “neatly” at your desk!
Question – I am writing because I have a question about the time currently allotted to lunch and lunch recess. I believe the fixed amount of time is 35 minutes. At our Granite District elementary school we have a concerned group of parents proposing changes to our lunch procedures. They would like to see less waste, and more food consumed by the students. They have proposed recess before lunch. As we discussed the potential scenarios for making this work at the community council meeting, the issue of time became a factor. Is there a possibility of this becoming a site based measure, or that the district could build in some flexibility of, say, an additional 10 minutes or more?
Response – Recess before or after lunch is something that several schools are already experimenting with. Please contact your school community council!
Question – I am concerned about the current district policy limiting the number of hours that para educators can work. My concern is the message it sends to para educators about their value and that we as a big employer in Utah do not care more about para educators’ ability to earn a living wage. This, of course, affects their willingness and ability to stay in a para educator position due to limited earning potential and lack of insurance and retirement benefits. And thus, there is a revolving door for hiring and training para educators, which takes a teacher’s valuable time away from teaching to a continual training of new para educators. This is a very real issue in special education settings. In the past, some para educators could find positions offering 20 to 30 hours but now are limited to 19 and 29 hours. I understand that these changes were made to limit their career status for hiring and firing reasons and to save money. The bigger concern for me is the fact that these para educators are not able to work enough hours to make a decent living and now many are not able to earn retirement benefits.
I am interested in your response and the district’s view in providing for the many paraeducators who contribute so much to the education of GSD’s students.
Response – Hourly employees play such a crucial role in the district, providing support in some of the toughest challenges we have to face. You may be aware that a law specific to classified school employees requires that we pay retirement for folks who work 20 hours or more per week. With the skyrocketing cost of retirement (now nearly an additional 20% on top of everything else) districts all across the state have begun limiting hourly employees to 19 hours – even though many of these great employees are not aware (or even interested) in the state retirement system.
Let’s work this through: As an example, when a $15 an hour position moves from 19 hours per week to 20 hours per week the position doesn’t cost only $15 more per week, but $75 (19 hours x $15 = $285 but 20 hours x $15 x 1.20 retirement cost = $360). $75 per week x 36 weeks = $2700 per employee and that times several thousands of hourly employees equals millions of dollars – all for only working one additional hour.
Recognizing the very concern you raise, and the fact that we’ve been approached by many hourly employees who didn’t know and didn’t care about the retirement system (several offered to waive the retirement – which the law doesn’t allow us to do) but really wanted more hours per week, we worked hard at the legislature this year to get the law changed so our employees had the same opportuntiies as all other government employees in the state (who can work up to 30 hours without the retirement cost kicking in). A few lobbyists argued against the bill, asserting that hourly employees accept low pay and few hours in order to be able to retire from the state system after 30 years of service. Although we worked with those lobbyists to amend the bill to “grandfather” hourly employees who had been receiving retirement, they continued to oppose the bill and it was defeated.
We recognize that there are two ways to look at this problem, but given the cuts of nearly $60,000,000 to our district in the last years, we’ve had to look at ways to avoid incurring additional costs. Which ever way you perceive the problem, please communicate with the classified employee association and let them know how you feel.
All,
Here is the latest snapshot video. Have a great day!
Supt. Bates:
Thank you for stepping back and trying to address the original “cart before the horse” question. I appreciate that you took a new look at the original question and tried to restate an answer.
I also was extremely frustrated the other day when the wireless was not functioning (yet again!) because I really am trying to integrate technology into my instruction. But it is really difficult to plan a lesson around technology only to have the technology be unavailable or non-functional. You have a lot more support from teachers on the technology push than you realize, but the infrastructure for technology in our district often fosters complete frustration.
Mary Lamb
6th Grade Teacher
Hillsdale Elementary
All,
Here is the latest snapshot video as a follow up to last weeks snapshot regarding putting the cart before the horse. Hope your week is going well.
Superintendent Bates